Evaluation of four global reanalysis products using in-situ observations in the Amundsen Sea Embayment, Antarctica

Jones, R.W., Renfrew, I.A. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9379-8215, Orr, A., Webber, B.G.M. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8812-5929, Holland, D.M. and Lazzara, M.A. (2016) Evaluation of four global reanalysis products using in-situ observations in the Amundsen Sea Embayment, Antarctica. Journal of Geophysical Research, 121 (11). 6240–6257. ISSN 0148-0227

[thumbnail of Jones_et_al-2016-Journal_of_Geophysical_Research__Atmospheres]
PDF (Jones_et_al-2016-Journal_of_Geophysical_Research__Atmospheres) - Accepted Version
Download (1MB) | Preview
[thumbnail of Published manuscript]
PDF (Published manuscript) - Published Version
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution.

Download (2MB) | Preview


The glaciers within the Amundsen Sea Embayment (ASE), West Antarctica, are amongst the most rapidly retreating in Antarctica. Meteorological reanalysis products are widely used to help understand and simulate the processes causing this retreat. Here we provide an evaluation against observations of four of the latest global reanalysis products within the ASE region—the European Centre for Medium-Range Weather Forecasts Interim Reanalysis (ERA-I), Japanese 55-year Reanalysis (JRA-55), Climate Forecast System Reanalysis (CFSR), and Modern Era Retrospective-Analysis for Research and Applications (MERRA). The observations comprise data from four automatic weather stations (AWSs), three research vessel cruises, and a new set of 38 radiosondes all within the period 2009–2014. All four reanalyses produce 2 m temperature fields that are colder than AWS observations, with the biases varying from approximately −1.8°C (ERA-I) to −6.8°C (MERRA). Over the Amundsen Sea, spatially averaged summertime biases are between −0.4°C (JRA-55) and −2.1°C (MERRA) with notably larger cold biases close to the continent (up to −6°C) in all reanalyses. All four reanalyses underestimate near-surface wind speed at high wind speeds (>15 m s−1) and exhibit dry biases and relatively large root-mean-square errors (RMSE) in specific humidity. A comparison to the radiosonde soundings shows that the cold, dry bias at the surface extends into the lower troposphere; here ERA-I and CFSR reanalyses provide the most accurate profiles. The reanalyses generally contain larger temperature and humidity biases, (and RMSE) when a temperature inversion is observed, and contain larger wind speed biases (~2 to 3 m s−1), when a low-level jet is observed.

Item Type: Article
Additional Information: ©2016. The Authors. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Faculty \ School: Faculty of Science > School of Environmental Sciences
University of East Anglia Research Groups/Centres > Theme - ClimateUEA
Faculty of Science
UEA Research Groups: Faculty of Science > Research Groups > Centre for Ocean and Atmospheric Sciences
Faculty of Science > Research Groups > Climatic Research Unit
Depositing User: Pure Connector
Date Deposited: 27 May 2016 10:00
Last Modified: 14 Jun 2023 12:35
URI: https://ueaeprints.uea.ac.uk/id/eprint/59101
DOI: 10.1002/2015JD024680


Downloads per month over past year

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item