Systematic review investigating multi-disciplinary team approaches to screening and early diagnosis of dementia in primary care – What are the positive and negative effects and who should deliver it?

Tools

Smith, Toby ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1673-2954, Cross, Jane ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7003-1916, Poland, Fiona ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0003-6911, Clay, Felix, Brookes, Abbey, Maidment, Ian, Penhale, Bridget ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8487-0606, Laidlaw, Kenneth and Fox, Chris ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9480-5704 (2018) Systematic review investigating multi-disciplinary team approaches to screening and early diagnosis of dementia in primary care – What are the positive and negative effects and who should deliver it? Current Alzheimer Research, 15 (1). pp. 5-17. ISSN 1567-2050

[thumbnail of Accepted manuscript]
Preview
 PDF (Accepted manuscript) - Accepted Version
Download (171kB) | Preview

Abstract

Background: Primary care services frequently provide the initial contact between people with dementia and health service providers. Early diagnosis and screening programmes have been suggested as a possible strategy to improve the identification of such individuals and treatment and planning health and social care support. Objective: To determine what early diagnostic and screening programmes have been adopted in primary care practice, to explore who should deliver these and to determine the possible positive and negative effects of an early diagnostic and screening programme for people with dementia in primary care. Methods: A systematic review of the literature was undertaken using published and unpublished research databases. All papers answering our research objectives were included. A narrative analysis of the literature was undertaken, with the CASP tools used appropriately to assess study quality. Results: Thirty-three papers were identified of moderate to high quality. The limited therapeutic options for those diagnosed with dementia means that even if such a programme were instigated, the clinical value remains questionable. Furthermore accuracy of the diagnosis remains difficult to assess due to poor evidence and this raises questions regarding whether people could be over- or under-diagnosed. Given the negative social and psychological consequences of such a diagnosis, this could be devastating for individuals. Conclusions: Early diagnostic and screening programme have not been widely adopted into primary care. Until there is rigorous evidence assessing the clinical and cost-effectiveness of such programmes, there remains insufficient evidence to support the adoption of these programmes in practice.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: diagnostic,population screening,cognitive impairment,general practice,community services
Faculty \ School: Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences > School of Health Sciences
Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences > Norwich Medical School
UEA Research Groups: Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences > Research Groups > Mental Health
Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences > Research Groups > Dementia & Complexity in Later Life
Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences > Research Groups > Health Promotion
Faculty of Science > Research Groups > Norwich Epidemiology Centre
Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences > Research Groups > Norwich Epidemiology Centre
Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences > Research Centres > Institute for Volunteering Research
Related URLs:
Depositing User: Pure Connector
Date Deposited: 26 May 2016 08:35
Last Modified: 20 Apr 2023 00:04
URI: https://ueaeprints.uea.ac.uk/id/eprint/59079
DOI: 10.2174/1567205014666170908094931

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item