SNOT-22 in a Control Population

Erskine, Sally, Hopkins, Claire, Clark, Allan, Anari, Shahram, Kumar, Nirmal, Robertson, Alasdair, Sunkaraneni, Vishnu, Wilson, J. A., Carrie, Sean, Kara, Naveed, Ray, Jaydip, Smith, R., Philpott, Carl, Morris, Steve, Ahmed, Shahzada, Jervis, Paul, Panesaar, Jaan, Farboud, Amir, Cathcart, Russell, Almeyda, Robert, Khalil, Hisham, Prinsley, Peter, Mansell, Nicolas, Salam, Mahmoud, Hobson, Jonathan, Woods, Jane and Coombes, Emma (2017) SNOT-22 in a Control Population. Clinical Otolaryngology, 42 (1). 81–85. ISSN 1749-4478

[img]
Preview
PDF (Manuscript) - Submitted Version
Download (357kB) | Preview

Abstract

AIM: To assess SNOT-22 and its subscales in a non-rhinosinusitis UK-wide population.  METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPLE: This analysis uses data from the 'Chronic Rhinosinusitis Epidemiology Study' (CRES) which recruited from 30 centres across the UK, and the Socioeconomic Cost of ChrOnic Rhinosinusitis study' (SocCoR); 250 volunteers without CRS were recruited as part of these studies. Study-specific questionnaires including demographics, socioeconomic factors and past medical history as well as SNOT-22 and SF-36 were distributed. The control (non-CRS) population had no self-reported nasal problems in the past, no chronic conditions undergoing active treatment and no hospital admissions in the preceding 12 months.  RESULTS: The mean SNOT-22 total score overall was 12.0. The mean was 10.2 for males with a median of 6.5, and a mean of 13.2 for females with a median of 9. Females scored significantly more highly than males on the sleep/fatigue and facial domains.  CONCLUSIONS: Our data demonstrate differences in SNOT-22 amongst males and females. These data can be used in future studies for comparison with different disease populations with rhinosinusitis. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.

Item Type: Article
Additional Information: This article has been accepted for publication and undergone full peer review but has not been through the copyediting, typesetting, pagination and proofreading process, which may lead to differences between this version and the Version of Record. Please cite this article as doi: 10.1111/coa.12667
Uncontrolled Keywords: sinonasal outcome test,control population
Faculty \ School: Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences > Norwich Medical School
Depositing User: Pure Connector
Date Deposited: 29 Apr 2016 16:00
Last Modified: 15 Jun 2020 23:49
URI: https://ueaeprints.uea.ac.uk/id/eprint/58510
DOI: 10.1111/coa.12667

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item