Randomized trial of complete versus lesion-only revascularization in patients undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention for STEMI and Multivessel Disease

Gershlick, Anthony H., Khan, Jamal Nasir, Kelly, Damian J., Greenwood, John P., Sasikaran, Thiagarajah, Curzen, Nick, Blackman, Daniel J., Dalby, Miles, Fairbrother, Kathryn L., Banya, Winston, Wang, Duolao, Flather, Marcus, Hetherington, Simon L., Kelion, Andrew D., Talwar, Suneel, Gunning, Mark, Hall, Roger, Swanton, Howard and Mccann, Gerry P. (2015) Randomized trial of complete versus lesion-only revascularization in patients undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention for STEMI and Multivessel Disease. Journal of the American College of Cardiology, 65 (10). pp. 963-972. ISSN 0735-1097

[img]
Preview
PDF (1-s2.0-S0735109715000819-main) - Published Version
Download (1MB) | Preview

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The optimal management of patients found to have multivessel disease while undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention (P-PCI) for ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction is uncertain.   OBJECTIVES: CvLPRIT (Complete versus Lesion-only Primary PCI trial) is a U.K. open-label randomized study comparing complete revascularization at index admission with treatment of the infarct-related artery (IRA) only.   METHODS: After they provided verbal assent and underwent coronary angiography, 296 patients in 7 U.K. centers were randomized through an interactive voice-response program to either in-hospital complete revascularization (n = 150) or IRA-only revascularization (n = 146). Complete revascularization was performed either at the time of P-PCI or before hospital discharge. Randomization was stratified by infarct location (anterior/nonanterior) and symptom onset (≤3 h or >3 h). The primary endpoint was a composite of all-cause death, recurrent myocardial infarction (MI), heart failure, and ischemia-driven revascularization within 12 months.   RESULTS: Patient groups were well matched for baseline clinical characteristics. The primary endpoint occurred in 10.0% of the complete revascularization group versus 21.2% in the IRA-only revascularization group (hazard ratio: 0.45; 95% confidence interval: 0.24 to 0.84; p = 0.009). A trend toward benefit was seen early after complete revascularization (p = 0.055 at 30 days). Although there was no significant reduction in death or MI, a nonsignificant reduction in all primary endpoint components was seen. There was no reduction in ischemic burden on myocardial perfusion scintigraphy or in the safety endpoints of major bleeding, contrast-induced nephropathy, or stroke between the groups.   CONCLUSIONS: In patients presenting for P-PCI with multivessel disease, index admission complete revascularization significantly lowered the rate of the composite primary endpoint at 12 months compared with treating only the IRA. In such patients, inpatient total revascularization may be considered, but larger clinical trials are required to confirm this result and specifically address whether this strategy is associated with improved survival. (Complete Versus Lesion-only Primary PCI Pilot Study [CvLPRIT]; ISRCTN70913605).

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: complete revascularization,non-infarct-related lesion,primary percutaneous coronary angioplasty
Faculty \ School: Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences > Norwich Medical School
Depositing User: Pure Connector
Date Deposited: 19 Dec 2015 07:08
Last Modified: 17 May 2020 23:52
URI: https://ueaeprints.uea.ac.uk/id/eprint/55757
DOI: 10.1016/j.jacc.2014.12.038

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item