Tools
ToolsFrazer, Michael L. (2006) Esotericism ancient and modern - Strauss contra straussianism on the art of political-philosophical writing. Political Theory, 34 (1). pp. 33-61. ISSN 0090-5917
Full text not available from this repository.Abstract
Leo Strauss presents at least two distinct accounts of the idea that the authors in the political-philosophical canon have often masked their true teachings. A weaker account of esotericism, dependent on the contingent fact of persecution, is attributed to the moderns, while a stronger account, stemming from a necessary conflict between philosophy and society, is attributed to the ancients. Although most interpreters agree that Strauss here sides with the ancients, this view fails to consider the possibility that Strauss's writings on esotericism may themselves be composed esoterically. A reevaluation of Straussian hermeneutics in light of this possibility suggests that the elitism and secrecy often associated with "Straussianism" may stem, not from Strauss's true account of esotericism, but instead from an exoteric doctrine designed to seduce students into a life of philosophy.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | leo strauss,esoteric,persecution,writing,hermeneutics |
| Faculty \ School: | Faculty of Arts and Humanities > School of Politics, Philosophy, Language and Communication Studies (former - to 2024) |
| UEA Research Groups: | Faculty of Arts and Humanities > Research Groups > Political, Social and International Studies Faculty of Arts and Humanities > Research Groups > Policy & Politics Faculty of Arts and Humanities > Research Groups > Cultural Politics, Communications & Media |
| Depositing User: | Pure Connector |
| Date Deposited: | 01 Dec 2015 10:00 |
| Last Modified: | 24 Sep 2024 11:23 |
| URI: | https://ueaeprints.uea.ac.uk/id/eprint/55586 |
| DOI: | 10.1177/0090591705277770 |
Actions (login required)
 |
View Item |