Reliability of identification of behavior change techniques in intervention descriptions

Abraham, Charles, Wood, Caroline E., Johnston, Marie, Francis, Jill, Hardeman, Wendy ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6498-9407, Richardson, Michelle and Michie, Susan (2015) Reliability of identification of behavior change techniques in intervention descriptions. Annals of Behavioral Medicine, 49 (6). pp. 885-900. ISSN 0883-6612

[thumbnail of Abraham-et-al-Accepted-Version-ABM-July-2015]
Preview
PDF (Abraham-et-al-Accepted-Version-ABM-July-2015) - Accepted Version
Download (966kB) | Preview

Abstract

PURPOSE: The aim of this paper is to assess the frequency of identification as well as the inter-coder and test-retest reliability of identification of behavior change techniques (BCTs) in written intervention descriptions. METHODS: Forty trained coders applied the "Behavior Change Technique Taxonomy version 1" (BCTTv1) to 40 intervention descriptions published in protocols and repeated this 1 month later. RESULTS: Eighty of 93 defined BCTs were identified by at least one trained coder, and 22 BCTs were identified in 16 (40 %) or more of 40 descriptions. Good inter-coder reliability was observed across 80 BCTs identified in the protocols: 66 (80 %) achieved mean prevalence and bias-adjusted kappa (PABAK) scores of 0.70 or greater, and 59 (74 %) achieved mean scores of 0.80 or greater. There was good within-coder agreement between baseline and 1 month, demonstrating good test-retest reliability. CONCLUSIONS: BCTTv1 can be used by trained coders to identify BCTs in intervention descriptions reliably. However, some frequently occurring BCT definitions require further clarification.

Item Type: Article
Faculty \ School: Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences > School of Health Sciences
Depositing User: Pure Connector
Date Deposited: 20 Nov 2015 11:00
Last Modified: 22 Oct 2022 00:24
URI: https://ueaeprints.uea.ac.uk/id/eprint/55506
DOI: 10.1007/s12160-015-9727-y

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item