Is periprocedural CK-MB a better indicator of prognosis after emergency and elective percutaneous coronary intervention compared with post-procedural cardiac troponins?

Gollop, Nicholas D, Dhullipala, Anumita, Nagrath, Nalin and Myint, Phyo K (2013) Is periprocedural CK-MB a better indicator of prognosis after emergency and elective percutaneous coronary intervention compared with post-procedural cardiac troponins? Interactive Cardiovascular and Thoracic Surgery, 17 (5). pp. 867-871. ISSN 1569-9285

Full text not available from this repository. (Request a copy)

Abstract

A best evidence topic in interventional cardiac surgery was written according to a structured protocol. The question we addressed related to the elevation of markers of cardiac damage associated with percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). We explored and compared the clinical and prognostic relevance of the elevation of creatinine kinase-myocardial band (CK-MB) and cardiac troponin (cTn) levels during the periprocedural period and the post-procedural period, respectively, following an emergency or elective PCI. We found in excess of 390 papers after a systematic literature search, of which 10 represented the best evidence to answer the clinical question. The authors, journal, date and country of publication, patient group studied, study type, relevant outcomes and results of these papers are tabulated. From the best evidence available it appears that the monitoring of cardiac biomarkers following a PCI can provide important clinical information about the health of the myocardium, as well as prognostic information on short to mid-term outcomes of mortality up to 3 years. The narrow evidence base advocates the use of periprocedural CK-MB monitoring, recommending that an elevation in CK-MB is a significant predictor of adverse events. Troponins remain a precise and reliable marker of cardiac damage; however, current evidence argues that cTn holds little prognostic relevance until the degree of elevation is almost five times the upper limit of normal (ULN). Thus, the best evidence recommends the use of periprocedural CK-MB routinely during PCI to provide clinical and prognostic information about the degree of myocardial injury and risk of post-procedural morbidity and mortality.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: benchmarking,biological markers,creatine kinase, mb form,emergencies,evidence-based medicine,humans,myocardial infarction,myocardium,percutaneous coronary intervention,predictive value of tests,risk factors,time factors,treatment outcome,troponin,up-regulation
Faculty \ School: Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences > Norwich Medical School
Depositing User: Pure Connector
Date Deposited: 24 Jul 2015 22:55
Last Modified: 22 Apr 2020 00:16
URI: https://ueaeprints.uea.ac.uk/id/eprint/53753
DOI: 10.1093/icvts/ivt303

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item