Private Law Theory and Taxonomy: Reframing the debate

Sheehan, Duncan and Arvind, T. T. (2015) Private Law Theory and Taxonomy: Reframing the debate. Legal Studies, 35 (3). 480–501. ISSN 1748-121X

[thumbnail of Reframing the debate - ACCEPTED] Microsoft Word (Reframing the debate - ACCEPTED) - Accepted Version
Download (178kB)


The aim of this paper is to reframe the taxonomy debate which has, in recent years, come to dominate private law theory. We argue that the debate to date has been flawed by two fundamental mistakes. First, little attention has been paid to how legal taxonomies are actually used. This, we argue, is regrettable: how we build a taxonomy depends on why we build a taxonomy, and a clearer focus on this question produces an approach that is very different from the approaches that currently dominate private law theory. Secondly, both sides in the debate have misunderstood what legal concepts are, and hence tend to misuse them. We argue that legal concepts are Weberian ideal types, and use philosophical theories of concepts to put forward a very different understanding of how concepts acquire content and are used in the legal system. Putting these together, we argue for a far more developmental, and historically informed, approach to taxonomy and to legal concepts generally.

Item Type: Article
Faculty \ School: Faculty of Social Sciences > School of Law
Depositing User: Pure Connector
Date Deposited: 23 Jan 2015 14:48
Last Modified: 01 May 2024 10:30
DOI: 10.1111/lest.12075


Downloads per month over past year

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item