Comparison of pooled risk estimates for adverse effects from different observational study designs:methodological overview

Golder, Su, Loke, Yoon K and Bland, Martin (2013) Comparison of pooled risk estimates for adverse effects from different observational study designs:methodological overview. PLoS One, 8 (8). ISSN 1932-6203

Full text not available from this repository. (Request a copy)

Abstract

A diverse range of study designs (e.g. case-control or cohort) are used in the evaluation of adverse effects. We aimed to ascertain whether the risk estimates from meta-analyses of case-control studies differ from that of other study designs.

Item Type: Article
Additional Information: © 2013 Golder et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Uncontrolled Keywords: anti-inflammatory agents, non-steroidal,case-control studies,contraceptives, oral, hormonal,hormone replacement therapy,humans,meta-analysis as topic,observational study as topic,odds ratio,research design,risk assessment
Faculty \ School: Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences > Norwich Medical School
Depositing User: Pure Connector
Date Deposited: 07 Jul 2014 13:34
Last Modified: 21 Apr 2020 23:07
URI: https://ueaeprints.uea.ac.uk/id/eprint/48926
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0071813

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item