Tools
ToolsPerez de Arenaza, Diego, Lees, Belinda, Flather, Marcus, Nugara, Fiona, Husebye, Trygve, Jasinski, Marek, Cisowski, Marek, Khan, Mohammed, Henein, Michael, Gaer, Jullien, Guvendik, Levant, Bochenek, Andrzej, Wos, Stanislaw, Lie, Mons, Van Nooten, Guido, Pennell, Dudley and Pepper, John and ASSERT (Aortic Stentless versus Stented valve assessed by Echocardiography Randomized Trial) Investigators (2005) Randomized comparison of stentless versus stented valves for aortic stenosis:effects on left ventricular mass. Circulation, 112 (17). pp. 2696-702. ISSN 0009-7322
Full text not available from this repository. (Request a copy)Abstract
Aortic valve replacement (AVR) is the established treatment for severe aortic stenosis. In response to the long-term results of aortic homografts, stentless porcine valves were introduced as an alternative low-resistance valve. We conducted a randomized trial comparing a stentless with a stented porcine valve in adults with severe aortic stenosis.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | aged,aortic valve stenosis,echocardiography,female,follow-up studies,heart valve prosthesis implantation,humans,magnetic resonance imaging,male,middle aged,organ size,patient selection,stents,time factors,treatment outcome,ventricular dysfunction, left,ventricular function, left |
| Faculty \ School: | Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences > Norwich Medical School |
| Depositing User: | Pure Connector |
| Date Deposited: | 20 Jan 2014 16:16 |
| Last Modified: | 03 Nov 2022 15:35 |
| URI: | https://ueaeprints.uea.ac.uk/id/eprint/46283 |
| DOI: | 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.104.521161 |
Actions (login required)
 |
View Item |