Randomized comparison of stentless versus stented valves for aortic stenosis:effects on left ventricular mass

Perez de Arenaza, Diego, Lees, Belinda, Flather, Marcus, Nugara, Fiona, Husebye, Trygve, Jasinski, Marek, Cisowski, Marek, Khan, Mohammed, Henein, Michael, Gaer, Jullien, Guvendik, Levant, Bochenek, Andrzej, Wos, Stanislaw, Lie, Mons, Van Nooten, Guido, Pennell, Dudley, Pepper, John and , ASSERT (Aortic Stentless versus Stented valve assessed by Echoca (2005) Randomized comparison of stentless versus stented valves for aortic stenosis:effects on left ventricular mass. Circulation, 112 (17). pp. 2696-702. ISSN 0009-7322

Full text not available from this repository. (Request a copy)

Abstract

Aortic valve replacement (AVR) is the established treatment for severe aortic stenosis. In response to the long-term results of aortic homografts, stentless porcine valves were introduced as an alternative low-resistance valve. We conducted a randomized trial comparing a stentless with a stented porcine valve in adults with severe aortic stenosis.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: aged,aortic valve stenosis,echocardiography,female,follow-up studies,heart valve prosthesis implantation,humans,magnetic resonance imaging,male,middle aged,organ size,patient selection,stents,time factors,treatment outcome,ventricular dysfunction, left,ventricular function, left
Faculty \ School: Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences > Norwich Medical School
Depositing User: Pure Connector
Date Deposited: 20 Jan 2014 16:16
Last Modified: 21 Apr 2020 22:34
URI: https://ueaeprints.uea.ac.uk/id/eprint/46283
DOI: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.104.521161

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item