Innateness, canalization, and the modality-independence of language: A reply to Griffiths and Machery

Collins, John (2011) Innateness, canalization, and the modality-independence of language: A reply to Griffiths and Machery. Philosophical Psychology, 24 (2). pp. 195-206. ISSN 0951-5089

Full text not available from this repository.

Abstract

Griffiths and Machery (Citation2008) argue that innateness is a “folk biological” notion, which, as such, has no useful reconstruction in contemporary biology. If this is so, not only is it wrong to identify the vernacular notion with the precise theoretical concept of canalization, but worse, it would appear that many of the putative scientific claims for particular competences and capacities being innate are simply misplaced. The present paper challenges the core substantive claim of Griffiths and Machery's position, namely, that innateness understood on canalization lines as environment-independent development (somehow and to some degree) is a confused, outmoded notion. It will be contended that the modality-independence of language offers a prima facie case against Griffiths and Machery's general position.

Item Type:	Article
Faculty \ School:	Faculty of Arts and Humanities > School of Philosophy (former - to 2014)
UEA Research Groups:	Faculty of Arts and Humanities > Research Groups > Philosophy
Depositing User:	Katherine Humphries
Date Deposited:	01 Feb 2012 13:18
Last Modified:	28 Mar 2025 02:48
URI:	https://ueaeprints.uea.ac.uk/id/eprint/36713
DOI:	10.1080/09515089.2010.533257

Actions (login required)

View Item