A survey of orthopaedic journal editors determining the criteria of manuscript selection for publication

Hing, Caroline B., Higgs, Deborah, Hooper, Lee ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7904-3331, Donell, Simon T. and Song, Fujian (2011) A survey of orthopaedic journal editors determining the criteria of manuscript selection for publication. Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research, 6. ISSN 1749-799X

[thumbnail of Hing_J_Orth_Surgery_&_Research_2011_1749-799X-6-19.pdf]
PDF (Hing_J_Orth_Surgery_&_Research_2011_1749-799X-6-19.pdf) - Published Version
Download (364kB) | Preview


Background: To investigate the characteristics of editors and criteria used by orthopaedic journal editors in assessing submitted manuscripts. Methods: Between 2008 to 2009 all 70 editors of Medline listed orthopaedic journals were approached prospectively with a questionnaire to determine the criteria used in assessing manuscripts for publication. Results: There was a 42% response rate. There was 1 female editor and the rest were male with 57% greater than 60 years of age. 67% of the editors worked in university teaching hospitals and 90% of publications were in English.The review process differed between journals with 59% using a review proforma, 52% reviewing an anonymised manuscript, 76% using a routine statistical review and 59% of journals used 2 reviewers routinely. In 89% of the editors surveyed, the editor was able to overrule the final decision of the reviewers.Important design factors considered for manuscript acceptance were that the study conclusions were justified (80%), that the statistical analysis was appropriate (76%), that the findings could change practice (72%). The level of evidence (70%) and type of study (62%) were deemed less important. When asked what factors were important in the manuscript influencing acceptance, 73% cited an understandable manuscript, 53% cited a well written manuscript and 50% a thorough literature review as very important factors. Conclusions: The editorial and review process in orthopaedic journals uses different approaches. There may be a risk of language bias among editors of orthopaedic journals with under-representation of non-English publications in the orthopaedic literature.

Item Type: Article
Faculty \ School: Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences > Norwich Medical School
Depositing User: Users 2731 not found.
Date Deposited: 01 Nov 2011 12:10
Last Modified: 23 Oct 2022 00:41
URI: https://ueaeprints.uea.ac.uk/id/eprint/35337
DOI: 10.1186/1749-799X-6-19

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item