Genetic associations in peripheral joint osteoarthritis and spinal degenerative disease: a systematic review

Ryder, J J, Garrison, K, Song, F, Hooper, L ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7904-3331, Skinner, J, Loke, Y, Loughlin, J, Higgins, J P T and Macgregor, AJ ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2163-2325 (2008) Genetic associations in peripheral joint osteoarthritis and spinal degenerative disease: a systematic review. Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases, 67 (5). pp. 584-591. ISSN 0003-4967

Full text not available from this repository. (Request a copy)

Abstract

We conducted a systematic review of genetic association studies for osteoarthritis of the peripheral joints (OA) and spinal degenerative disease (SDD). Electronic searches were carried out for any English language article reporting on a gene association study for either OA or SDD published up until the end of 2006. A team of seven reviewers used a standardised template to extract data in duplicate. In all, 90 studies fulfilled our inclusion criteria, reporting a total of 94 significant associations from 83 different genes. We found relatively few instances in which a specific gene–disease association had been analysed by more than one study, and there were 14 cases in which significant associations were replicated in independent studies (at joints associated with the AGC1, ASPN, COL9A2, COL9A3, COL11A2, ESR1, FZRB, HFE, IL1A, IL1RN, PTGS2 and VDR genes). Methodological and reporting problems were widespread, including failure to report full results, missing population details, multiple testing, and over-reliance on subgroup analysis. In summary, the complex phenotypes of OA and SDD may have made it difficult for researchers to focus their efforts. The field is dominated by isolated analyses of disparate potential associations, a problem that is amplified by the frequent analysis of different polymorphisms within individual genes. Flaws in study methodology and interpretation undoubtedly increase the risk of publication bias. Closer adherence to published recommendations (in particular those produced by HuGENet) will help to ensure that future studies are well-designed and build on current understanding, rather than simply adding to the growing bank of potential associations.

Item Type: Article
Faculty \ School: Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences > Norwich Medical School
UEA Research Groups: Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences > Research Groups > Medicine (former - to 2013)
Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences > Research Groups > Epidemiology and Public Health
Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences > Research Groups > Musculoskeletal Medicine
Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences > Research Groups > Nutrition and Preventive Medicine
Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences > Research Groups > Public Health and Health Services Research (former - to 2023)
Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences > Research Groups > Health Services and Primary Care
Faculty of Science > Research Groups > Norwich Epidemiology Centre
Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences > Research Groups > Norwich Epidemiology Centre
Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences > Research Centres > Population Health
Depositing User: Danelle Breach
Date Deposited: 12 Apr 2011 15:21
Last Modified: 19 Oct 2023 00:42
URI: https://ueaeprints.uea.ac.uk/id/eprint/29123
DOI: 10.1136/ard.2007.073874

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item