Valuing risk reductions: Testing for range biases in payment card and random card sorting methods

Covey, Judith, Loomes, Graham and Bateman, Ian J. (2007) Valuing risk reductions: Testing for range biases in payment card and random card sorting methods. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 50 (4). pp. 467-482. ISSN 1360-0559

Full text not available from this repository.


Ongoing concerns with regard to the appropriate approach to elicitation of willingness-to-pay responses in contingent valuation studies have led to the development of a number of alternative techniques. One of the most recent, and on the surface, most promising of these is the random card sorting approach (RCS) which has been used for policy purposes to value risk reductions. This paper provides the first formal test of this procedure, comparing it against the widely used payment card (PC) format from which it is developed and whose recognised problems, such as range bias, it claims to address. However, the findings suggest that the RCS procedure is no less vulnerable to range bias than the PC method for eliciting both monetary values of health risk reductions and non-monetary estimates of death rates. Conclusions for future research initiatives are drawn.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: sdg 3 - good health and well-being ,/dk/atira/pure/sustainabledevelopmentgoals/good_health_and_well_being
Faculty \ School: Faculty of Science > School of Environmental Sciences
UEA Research Groups: Faculty of Science > Research Centres > Centre for Social and Economic Research on the Global Environment (CSERGE)
Faculty of Science > Research Groups > Resources, Sustainability and Governance (former - to 2018)
Faculty of Social Sciences > Research Centres > Centre for Behavioural and Experimental Social Sciences
Depositing User: Rosie Cullington
Date Deposited: 26 Feb 2011 19:05
Last Modified: 22 Apr 2023 01:15
DOI: 10.1080/09640560701401986

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item