Environmental, Social, and Governance Information Disclosure: Who Discloses Wins?

Wang, Siqi, Cheah, Jun-Hwa ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8440-9564, Wu, Christoph ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1171-1417 and Lim, Weng Marc (2026) Environmental, Social, and Governance Information Disclosure: Who Discloses Wins? Business Strategy and the Environment. ISSN 0964-4733

Preview

PDF (BSE-Wang_et_al._2026_-Environmental_Social_and_Governance_Information_Disclosure-Who_Discloses_Wins) - Published Version Available under License Creative Commons Attribution. Download (2MB) | Preview

Abstract

As Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) Information Disclosure (ESG-ID) transitions from voluntary to mandatory disclosure, its drivers and impacts have become focal points of discussion. Existing research, however, lacks integration, which, in turn, has led to fragmented theoretical and practical insights. This study conducts a multi-layered systematic literature review on ESG-ID following the Scientific Procedures and Rationales for Systematic Literature Reviews (SPAR-4-SLR) protocol. At Layer 1, a broad bibliometric analysis is performed on 1507 articles retrieved from Scopus and Web of Science to delineate the field's developmental trajectory. At Layer 2, a TCCM-ADO-based content analysis is applied to 437 articles published in ABDC A*/A-ranked journals, uncovering the theoretical underpinnings (T), contextual settings (C), characteristic patterns (C), and methodological approaches (M) that inform ESG-ID research while simultaneously examining the antecedents (A), disclosure decisions (D), and outcomes (O) of ESG-ID. Through this review, an integrated knowledge framework was established to serve as a reference point for the theoretical advancement and practical application of ESG-ID. Notably, the framework posits that firms' ESG disclosure choices regarding strategy, form, and quality are driven and impeded by internal and external antecedents. These choices translate into economic, informational, and relational outcomes through specific transmission mechanisms. Key mediators include analyst attention, corporate culture, financing constraints, green innovation, information transparency, and profit sustainability. Disclosure effectiveness may be conditioned by key moderators such as ownership structure, digital transformation, industry exposure, and public attention. However, the positive impact of ESG-ID is not universal, as such disclosure may lose its effectiveness or even lead to negative consequences when assurance is insufficient or greenwashing is detected.

Item Type:	Article
Additional Information:	Data Availability Statement: The TCCM-ADO coding for the 30 most cited articles in the focused corpus is provided in Appendix Table A1. The complete coding table for all 437 articles is available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.
Uncontrolled Keywords:	corporate sustainability,environmental,esg,governance,information disclosure,social,sdg 8 - decent work and economic growth,3* ,/dk/atira/pure/sustainabledevelopmentgoals/decent_work_and_economic_growth
Faculty \ School:	Faculty of Social Sciences > Norwich Business School
UEA Research Groups:	Faculty of Social Sciences > Research Groups > Marketing Faculty of Social Sciences > Research Groups > Employment Systems and Institutions
Depositing User:	LivePure Connector
Date Deposited:	05 Oct 2026 15:19
Last Modified:	07 Oct 2026 20:23
URI:	https://ueaeprints.uea.ac.uk/id/eprint/104728
DOI:

Downloads

Actions (login required)

View Item