A Top-Down View of Global and Regional Carbon Budgets From an Ensemble of Atmospheric Inversions

Tools

van der Woude, A. M., Luijkx, I. T., de Kok, R. J., Peters, W., Chevallier, F., Rödenbeck, C., Ciais, P., Chandra, N., Wang, K., Janardanan, R., van Asperen, H., Bastos, A., van den Berg, A., Bloom, A. A., Botia, S., Bowman, K., Canadell, J. G., de Souza, R. A. F., Dias-Junior, C. Q., Feng, L., Friedlingstein, P., Gatti, L., Gloor, E., Ishijima, K., Jiang, F., Jin, Z., Ju, W., Lan, X., Liu, J., Liu, Z., Machida, T., Maksyutov, S., Manning, A., Martinez, A., Martins, G. A., Mckain, K., Miller, J. B., Nayagam, L., Niwa, Y., Palmer, P., Patra, P. K., Pickers, P. A., Poulter, B., Stephens, B. B., Sweeney, C., Wofsy, S., Wu, Z., Yang, D., Yun, J. and Zeng, N. (2026) A Top-Down View of Global and Regional Carbon Budgets From an Ensemble of Atmospheric Inversions. Global Biogeochemical Cycles, 40 (6). ISSN 0886-6236

[thumbnail of Global Biogeochemical Cycles - 2026 - Woude - A Top‐Down View of Global and Regional Carbon Budgets From an Ensemble of]
Preview
 PDF (Global Biogeochemical Cycles - 2026 - Woude - A Top‐Down View of Global and Regional Carbon Budgets From an Ensemble of) - Published Version
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution.
Download (6MB) | Preview

Abstract

Atmospheric inversions provide surface CO 2 flux estimates based on in situ observed atmospheric CO 2 mole fractions or satellite-based column average CO 2 (XCO 2). Here, we provide a detailed assessment of 14 atmospheric CO 2 inversions included in the Global Carbon Budget (GCB2024). We develop tools to further assess and use these inversions in global and regional carbon cycle studies including the GCB and the REgional Carbon Cycle Assessment and Processes (RECCAP2) initiative. We show that the global atmospheric CO 2 growth rate and its interannual variability are reproduced well by all inversions. In contrast to bottom-up models, inversions provide carbon flux estimates directly constrained by observations. Our ensemble mean estimates of the global sinks for the period 2015–2023 are −1.41 (Formula presented.) 0.55 PgC yr −1 for the net land sink (including land-use change emissions) and −2.97 (Formula presented.) 0.55 PgC yr −1 for the global net ocean sink (uncertainties reported as (Formula presented.) across inversions; estimates include fossil fuel and river flux adjustments). On regional scales, we find significant spread in flux estimates between inversions across regions, and we present criteria and metrics to derive flux-observation relation constraints or subselect ensembles of inversions based on independent observations. Furthermore, we use the atmospheric inversions to assess the atmospheric growth rate of CO 2. We show that the factor used to convert annual observation-based growth rates to net fluxes is variable over time as a result of atmospheric mixing. Finally, we propose guidelines on how to use the inverse results in global and regional carbon budget studies by the wider carbon cycle community.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: atmospheric co,carbon budget,inversions,land carbon sink,ocean carbon sink,regional co flux estimates,global and planetary change,environmental chemistry,general environmental science,atmospheric science ,/dk/atira/pure/subjectarea/asjc/2300/2306
Faculty \ School: Faculty of Science > School of Environmental Sciences
University of East Anglia Research Groups/Centres > Theme - ClimateUEA
UEA Research Groups: Faculty of Science > Research Groups > Centre for Ocean and Atmospheric Sciences
Related URLs:
Depositing User: LivePure Connector
Date Deposited: 08 Sep 2026 13:22
Last Modified: 08 Sep 2026 23:04
URI: https://ueaeprints.uea.ac.uk/id/eprint/104471
DOI: 10.1029/2025GB008779

Downloads

Downloads per month over past year

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item