Rape myths and juror decision-making in sexual assault cases: An updated systematic review and meta-analysis

Bouillaut, Kiah, Hinton, William, Fitton, Lucy ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8396-8356 and Beazley, Peter ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8821-1213 (2026) Rape myths and juror decision-making in sexual assault cases: An updated systematic review and meta-analysis. International Journal of Law, Crime and Justice. ISSN 1876-763X

Microsoft Word (OpenXML) (IJLCJ Anonymous Manuscript_Revised.2.0docx) - Accepted Version Restricted to Repository staff only until 19 August 2028. Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial No Derivatives. Request a copy

Abstract

Despite legal reforms and increased public attention to sexual violence, conviction rates for rape remain low and concerns persist about the role of rape myths in juror decision-making. An earlier meta-analysis by Dinos et al. (2015) suggested that higher rape myth acceptance (RMA) is associated with more defendant-favourable outcomes but was based largely on pre-2012 studies. This systematic review and meta-analysis updates that work in a contemporary context. Peer-reviewed studies published between 2012 and 2025 were eligible if adult mock jurors evaluated a rape or sexual assault case, completed a measure of RMA or a conceptually analogous construct, and provided at least one legally relevant decision outcome (e.g. verdict, guilt rating, victim blame). Twenty studies (N = 7682) met inclusion criteria. Three-level random-effects models pooled Pearson's r for guilt-related and victim-blame outcomes. Higher RMA was associated with lower guilt judgments (r = −0.16) and higher victim blame (r = 0.52). Heterogeneity was substantial for both outcomes and was not explained by sample type or broad study location. These findings suggest that rape myths remain present in how complainants are evaluated, but that their impact on verdicts is smaller and more context-dependent than earlier work implied.

Item Type:	Article
Uncontrolled Keywords:	sdg 5 - gender equality,sdg 16 - peace, justice and strong institutions ,/dk/atira/pure/sustainabledevelopmentgoals/gender_equality
Faculty \ School:	Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences > Norwich Medical School
UEA Research Groups:	Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences > Research Centres > Mental Health and Social Care (fka Lifespan Health)
Depositing User:	LivePure Connector
Date Deposited:	21 Aug 2026 10:31
Last Modified:	23 Aug 2026 23:02
URI:	https://ueaeprints.uea.ac.uk/id/eprint/104293
DOI:	10.1016/j.ijlcj.2026.100887

Actions (login required)

View Item