Effectiveness of the BabyBreathe intervention for maintaining postpartum smoking cessation: multicentre pragmatic randomised controlled trial

Notley, Caitlin ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0876-3304, Belderson, Pippa, Clark, Lucy ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7162-0512, Brown, Tracey J., Bauld, Linda, Clark, Allan B. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2965-8941, Duneclift, Sharon, Gilroy, Vicky, Harris, Tess, Hardeman, Wendy ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6498-9407, Holland, Richard, Howard, Gregory ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5749-0782, Naughton, Felix, Reynolds, Kieran, Smith, Dan, Stirling, Susan, Turner, David ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1689-4147 and Ussher, Michael (2026) Effectiveness of the BabyBreathe intervention for maintaining postpartum smoking cessation: multicentre pragmatic randomised controlled trial. BMJ-British Medical Journal. ISSN 1759-2151

[thumbnail of bmj-2026-100242.full]
Preview
PDF (bmj-2026-100242.full) - Published Version
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution.

Download (2MB) | Preview

Abstract

Objective: To assess the effectiveness of an interpersonal and digital intervention, BabyBreathe, for maintaining postpartum smoking cessation. Design: Multicentre pragmatic individually randomised controlled trial. Setting: Community health visiting services in the UK. Participants: 887 pregnant women and people who reported quitting smoking in the 12 months before, or during, pregnancy, with abstinence verified by exhaled carbon monoxide readings. A secure web based randomisation sequence, stratified by recruitment hub, partner smoking status, and quit timing (before or during pregnancy), was used to randomise participants (1:1) to receive the intervention or usual care. The trial was unblinded. Intervention: BabyBreathe comprised in-person or remote smoking cessation maintenance interpersonal support at 28-32 weeks’ gestation and 10-14 days post partum. The BabyBreathe box, posted at the time of birth notification, contained theory driven advice for cessation maintenance, a sample of nicotine replacement gum, and motivational tools. Tailored motivational and educational text messages were provided. A website and app provided tailored cessation maintenance advice, social support, motivational tools, and gamification. Control was usual postpartum care. Main outcome measure: The primary outcome was continuous smoking abstinence, verified by exhaled carbon monoxide concentration (≤7 parts per million (ppm)) 12 months post partum. Results: Between 4 September 2021 and 3 August 2023, 887 participants were randomised: 442 to receive BabyBreathe and 445 to receive usual care. After one post-randomisation exclusion, 886 participants were included in an intention-to-treat analysis. The group difference in smoking abstinence at 12 months post partum was not significant (BabyBreathe 242/441 (54.9%) v usual care 222/445 (49.9%); odds ratio 1.23, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.94 to 1.60, P=0.13, risk difference 4.8% (-1.7% to 11.2%), and number needed to treat (NNT) 21 (NNT to benefit 8.9 to ∞) and NNT to harm 59). A post hoc per protocol analysis favoured the intervention (BabyBreathe 200/347 (57.6%) v usual care 222/445 (49.9%); adjusted odds ratio 1.36, 95% CI 1.02 to 1.81, P=0.04), risk difference 7.2% (0.3% to 14.1%), and NNT 13.9 (7.1 to 333.3). No trial related adverse incidents occurred. Conclusions: BabyBreathe did not statistically significantly increase sustained smoking abstinence post partum for people who quit smoking in pregnancy. A post hoc per protocol analysis, including only those who received interpersonal support as intended, showed statistically significantly greater benefit from BabyBreathe over usual care. A focus on fidelity and further targeting of BabyBreathe to groups with lower socioeconomic status may be warranted. Trial registration ISRCTN Registry ISRCTN70307341.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: 4* ,/dk/atira/pure/researchoutput/REFrank/4_
Faculty \ School: Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences > Norwich Medical School
Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences > School of Health Sciences
Faculty of Science > School of Computing Sciences
UEA Research Groups: Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences > Research Centres > Public Health
Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences > Research Groups > Norwich Clinical Trials Unit
Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences > Research Groups > Implementation Science EAST
Faculty of Science > Research Groups > Statistics
Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences > Research Groups > Health Services and Primary Care
Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences > Research Groups > Epidemiology and Public Health
Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences > Research Groups > Behaviour Change EAST
Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences > Research Centres > Norwich Institute for Healthy Aging
Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences > Research Groups > Health Promotion
Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences > Research Groups > Health Economics
Depositing User: LivePure Connector
Date Deposited: 19 Aug 2026 11:19
Last Modified: 23 Aug 2026 05:26
URI: https://ueaeprints.uea.ac.uk/id/eprint/104237
DOI: 10.1136/bmj-2026-100242

Downloads

Downloads per month over past year

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item