Cost utility and cost-effectiveness of the APPLE-Tree programme: Active Prevention in People at risk of dementia through Lifestyle, bEhaviour change and Technology to build REsiliEnce: economic evaluation embedded within a randomised controlled trial

Demnitz-King, Harriet, Cooper, Claudia, Poppe, Michaela, Budgett, Jessica, Alberts, Sweedal, Duffy, Larisa, Adeleke, Mariam, Barber, Julie, Aguirre, Elisa, Brodaty, Henry, Burton, Alexandra, Higgs, Paul, Huntley, Jonathan, Kales, Helen C, Lang, Iain A, Marchant, Natalie L, Morgan-Trimmer, Sarah, Minihane, Anne Marie ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9042-4226, Rapaport, Penny, Rio, Miguel, Ritchie, Karen, Walker, Zuzana, Walters, Kate and Hunter, Rachael M (2026) Cost utility and cost-effectiveness of the APPLE-Tree programme: Active Prevention in People at risk of dementia through Lifestyle, bEhaviour change and Technology to build REsiliEnce: economic evaluation embedded within a randomised controlled trial. Age and Ageing, 55 (6). ISSN 0002-0729

Full text not available from this repository. (Request a copy)

Abstract

Background: Previous studies have modelled long-term cost-effectiveness of dementia prevention but seldom within trials. APPLE-Tree (Active Prevention in People at risk of dementia through Lifestyle, bEhaviour change and Technology to build REsiliEnce) is a personalised, multi-domain, low-intensity dementia prevention intervention for adults experiencing subjective cognitive decline or mild cognitive impairment. Intervention receipt, relative to control, was associated with an adjusted mean difference of 0.06 (95%CI −0.001 to −0.128) in the Neuropsychological Test Battery (NTB). We evaluated cost-effectiveness from health- and social-care perspectives over 2 years.  Methods: We recruited 746 older adults from English health and community settings and randomly assigned them (1:1) to APPLE-Tree plus usual care (UC) or UC plus written dementia prevention information. Quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) were calculated from the EQ-5D-5L. Over 24-months, intention-to-treat analyses compared QALYs (primary) and incremental cost per NTB unit (one z-score) change (secondary).  Results: Between October 2020 and December 2022, 374 participants were randomised to intervention and 372 to control. Mean adjusted QALYs were 1.511 (intervention) and 1.520 (control), an adjusted difference of −0.010 (95%CI −0.04 to −0.022). Mean adjusted (SD) costs were £2966 (3629) and £2551 (4439), respectively. Cost per 1-point NTB change z-score was £6809. At a £30 000 threshold, the probability of cost-effective was 12% and 96% based on QALYs and cognition, respectively. Post hoc analyses indicated higher cost-effectiveness for non-White participants (incremental costs: £374; 95%CI −590.751 to −1338.515) and socioeconomically disadvantaged participants (non-homeowners), who had higher QALYs (0.106) and lower costs (−£1830), yielding a 98% probability of cost-effectiveness at a £20 000 threshold.  Conclusion: APPLE-Tree has a high probability of being cost-effective for a 1-point NTB gain, a difference previously associated with a three-fold reduction in 5-year dementia risk. QALY-based cost-effectiveness was not observed, but post-hoc analyses suggested it may be more effective in groups with greater needs. Findings highlight the potential of targeted, lower-intensity interventions to reduce dementia risk. Longer-term follow-up is required to determine whether cost-effectiveness is realised over time.

Item Type: Article
Additional Information: Publisher Copyright: © The Author(s) 2026. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the British Geriatrics Society. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Uncontrolled Keywords: dementia,health economics,non-pharmacological,older people,prevention,ageing,geriatrics and gerontology ,/dk/atira/pure/subjectarea/asjc/1300/1302
Faculty \ School: Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences > Norwich Medical School
UEA Research Groups: Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences > Research Centres > Norwich Institute for Healthy Aging
Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences > Research Centres > Metabolic Health
Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences > Research Groups > Cardiovascular and Metabolic Health
Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences > Research Groups > Nutrition and Preventive Medicine
Related URLs:
Depositing User: LivePure Connector
Date Deposited: 29 Jun 2026 14:03
Last Modified: 29 Jun 2026 14:12
URI: https://ueaeprints.uea.ac.uk/id/eprint/103520
DOI: 10.1093/ageing/afag176

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item