Assessment of Paclitaxel Drug-Coated Balloon-Only Angioplasty for Multivessel Coronary Artery Disease

Merinopoulos, Ioannis, Corballis, Natasha, Bhalraam, U., Natarajan, Rajkumar ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8636-8452, Gunawardena, Tharusha, Reinhold, Johannes ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2412-2574, Maart, Clint, Sawh, Chris, Sulfi, Sreekumar, Wistow, Trevor, Ryding, Alisdair, Gilbert, Tim, Vassiliou, Vassilios S. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4005-7752 and Eccleshall, Simon C. (2026) Assessment of Paclitaxel Drug-Coated Balloon-Only Angioplasty for Multivessel Coronary Artery Disease. Journal of Clinical Medicine, 15 (1). ISSN 2077-0383

Full text not available from this repository. (Request a copy)

Abstract

Background: There are limited data about the use of drug-coated balloon (DCB)-only angioplasty for multivessel coronary disease.  Objectives: The aim of this study was to assess the safety and efficacy of DCB-only angioplasty as compared with second-generation drug-eluting stents (DESs) in patients undergoing multivessel angioplasty.  Methods: We compared major adverse cardiovascular events (MACEs) in all patients undergoing multivessel angioplasty in our institution from 1 January 2015 until 15 November 2019, with either the DCB-only or DES-only strategy. The primary endpoint of our study was a MACE, including cardiovascular mortality, acute coronary syndrome, target lesion revascularisation, stroke, or major bleeding. Data were analysed using Cox regression models, Kaplan–Meier estimator plots, and propensity score matching.  Results: A total of 159 consecutive patients treated with DCB-only angioplasty and 222 consecutive patients treated with DES-only angioplasty were identified. The majority of the vessels treated were large vessels (>3 mm). After a median follow-up of 4 years, a total of 52 (33%) patients in the DCB and 73 (33%) patients in the DES group encountered a MACE (p = 0.97). The results did not change following propensity score matching. On multivariate Cox regression analysis in the propensity score-matched cohort, atrial fibrillation [HR = 2.37, CI: (1.22–4.61), p = 0.011] and diabetes [HR = 1.71, CI: (1.13–2.60), p = 0.011] were the only independent adverse predictors of MACE.  Conclusions: DCB-only angioplasty appears to be safe and efficient when compared to DES for multivessel angioplasty in terms of MACEs after a follow-up of 4 years.

Item Type: Article
Additional Information: Data Availability Statement: Data can be made available following appropriate request to the corresponding author.
Uncontrolled Keywords: drug coated balloon only angioplasty,drug eluting stent,multivessel angioplasty,general medicine,sdg 3 - good health and well-being ,/dk/atira/pure/subjectarea/asjc/2700/2700
Faculty \ School: Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences > Norwich Medical School
UEA Research Groups: Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences > Research Centres > Metabolic Health
Faculty of Science > Research Groups > Norwich Epidemiology Centre
Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences > Research Groups > Norwich Epidemiology Centre
Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences > Research Groups > Cardiovascular and Metabolic Health
Related URLs:
Depositing User: LivePure Connector
Date Deposited: 03 Mar 2026 16:30
Last Modified: 18 Jun 2026 20:54
URI: https://ueaeprints.uea.ac.uk/id/eprint/102156
DOI: 10.3390/jcm15010204

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item