The effectiveness of a multidisciplinary intervention strategy for the treatment of symptomatic joint hypermobility in childhood:A randomised, single Centre parallel group trial (The Bendy Study)

Bale, Peter, Easton, Vicky, Bacon, Holly, Jerman, Emma, Watts, Laura, Barton, Garry, Clark, Allan, Armon, Kate and MacGregor, Alex J. (2019) The effectiveness of a multidisciplinary intervention strategy for the treatment of symptomatic joint hypermobility in childhood:A randomised, single Centre parallel group trial (The Bendy Study). Pediatric Rheumatology, 17 (2). ISSN 1546-0096

[img]
Preview
PDF (Published_Manuscript) - Published Version
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution.

Download (1021kB) | Preview

    Abstract

    Introduction: Joint hypermobility is common in childhood and can be associated with musculoskeletal pain and dysfunction. Current management is delivered by a multidisciplinary team, but evidence of effectiveness is limited. This clinical trial aimed to determine whether a structured multidisciplinary, multisite intervention resulted in improved clinical outcomes compared with standard care. Method: A prospective randomised, single centre parallel group trial comparing an 8-week individualised multidisciplinary intervention programme (bespoke physiotherapy and occupational therapy in the clinical, home and school environment) with current standard management (advice, information and therapy referral if deemed necessary). The primary endpoint of the study was between group difference in child reported pain from baseline to 12 months as assessed using the Wong Baker faces pain scale. Secondary endpoints were parent reported pain (100 mm visual analogue scale), parent reported function (child health assessment questionnaire), child reported quality of life (child health utility 9-dimensional assessment), coordination (movement assessment battery for children version 2) and grip strength (handheld dynamometer). Results: 119 children aged 5 to 16 years, with symptomatic hypermobility were randomised to receive an individualised multidisciplinary intervention (I) (n = 59) or standard management (S) (n = 60). Of these, 105 completed follow up at 12 months. No additional significant benefit could be shown from the intervention compared to standard management. However, there was a statistically significant improvement in child and parent reported pain, coordination and grip strength in both groups. The response was independent of the degree of hypermobility. Conclusion: This is the first randomised controlled trial to compare a structured multidisciplinary, multisite intervention with standard care in symptomatic childhood hypermobility. For the majority, the provision of education and positive interventions aimed at promoting healthy exercise and self-management was associated with significant benefit without the need for more complex interventions. Trial registration: The trial was registered prospectively with the national database at the Clinical Research Network (UKCRN Portfolio 9366). The trial was registered retrospectively with ISRCTN (ISRCTN86573140).

    Item Type: Article
    Uncontrolled Keywords: children and young people,hypermobility,occupational therapy,pain,physiotherapy,pediatrics, perinatology, and child health,rheumatology,immunology and allergy ,/dk/atira/pure/subjectarea/asjc/2700/2735
    Faculty \ School: Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences > Norwich Medical School
    Faculty of Science > School of Pharmacy
    Related URLs:
    Depositing User: LivePure Connector
    Date Deposited: 18 Jan 2019 13:30
    Last Modified: 09 Apr 2019 14:05
    URI: https://ueaeprints.uea.ac.uk/id/eprint/69613
    DOI: 10.1186/s12969-018-0298-x

    Actions (login required)

    View Item