Experimental ordinary language philosophy: a cross-linguistic study of defeasible default inferences

Fischer, Eugen, Engelhardt, Paul, Horvath, Joachim and Ohtani, Hiroshi (2019) Experimental ordinary language philosophy: a cross-linguistic study of defeasible default inferences. Synthese. ISSN 0039-7857

[img] PDF (Accepted_Manuscript) - Submitted Version
Restricted to Repository staff only until 31 December 2099.

Download (824kB) | Request a copy
    PDF (Synthese_Fischer_etal_2019) - Published Version
    Available under License Creative Commons Attribution.

    Download (687kB) | Preview


      This paper provides new tools for philosophical argument analysis and fresh empirical foundations for ‘critical’ ordinary language philosophy. Language comprehension routinely involves stereotypical inferences with contextual defeaters. J.L. Austin’s Sense and Sensibilia first mooted the idea that contextually inappropriate stereotypical inferences from verbal case-descriptions drive some philosophical paradoxes; these engender philosophical problems that can be resolved by exposing the underlying fallacies. We build on psycholinguistic research on salience effects to explain when and why even perfectly competent speakers cannot help making stereotypical inferences which are contextually inappropriate. We analyse a classical paradox about perception (‘argument from illusion’), suggest it relies on contextually inappropriate stereotypical inferences from appearance-verbs, and show that the conditions we identified as leading to contextually inappropriate stereotypical inferences are met in formulations of the paradox. Three experiments use a forced-choice plausibility-ranking task to document the predicted inappropriate inferences, in English, German, and Japanese. The cross-linguistic study allows us to assess the wider relevance of the proposed analysis. Our findings open up new perspectives for ‘evidential’ experimental philosophy.

      Item Type: Article
      Uncontrolled Keywords: experimental philosophy,ordinary language philosophy,salience effects,naturalised argument analysis,argument from illusion,cross-cultural psycholinguistics
      Faculty \ School: University of East Anglia > Faculty of Arts and Humanities > Research Groups > Philosophy
      Faculty of Arts and Humanities > School of Politics, Philosophy, Language and Communication Studies
      Faculty of Social Sciences > School of Psychology
      Related URLs:
      Depositing User: LivePure Connector
      Date Deposited: 04 Jan 2019 15:30
      Last Modified: 07 Jun 2019 01:03
      URI: https://ueaeprints.uea.ac.uk/id/eprint/69448
      DOI: 10.1007/s11229-019-02081-4

      Actions (login required)

      View Item