Experimental ordinary language philosophy: a cross-linguistic study of defeasible default inferences

Fischer, Eugen ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2088-1610, Engelhardt, Paul E., Horvath, Joachim and Ohtani, Hiroshi (2021) Experimental ordinary language philosophy: a cross-linguistic study of defeasible default inferences. Synthese, 198 (2). 1029–1070. ISSN 0039-7857

[thumbnail of Synthese_Fischer_etal_2019]
Preview
PDF (Synthese_Fischer_etal_2019) - Published Version
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution.

Download (703kB) | Preview

Abstract

This paper provides new tools for philosophical argument analysis and fresh empirical foundations for ‘critical’ ordinary language philosophy. Language comprehension routinely involves stereotypical inferences with contextual defeaters. J.L. Austin’s Sense and Sensibilia first mooted the idea that contextually inappropriate stereotypical inferences from verbal case-descriptions drive some philosophical paradoxes; these engender philosophical problems that can be resolved by exposing the underlying fallacies. We build on psycholinguistic research on salience effects to explain when and why even perfectly competent speakers cannot help making stereotypical inferences which are contextually inappropriate. We analyse a classical paradox about perception (‘argument from illusion’), suggest it relies on contextually inappropriate stereotypical inferences from appearance-verbs, and show that the conditions we identified as leading to contextually inappropriate stereotypical inferences are met in formulations of the paradox. Three experiments use a forced-choice plausibility-ranking task to document the predicted inappropriate inferences, in English, German, and Japanese. The cross-linguistic study allows us to assess the wider relevance of the proposed analysis. Our findings open up new perspectives for ‘evidential’ experimental philosophy.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: experimental philosophy,ordinary language philosophy,salience effects,naturalised argument analysis,argument from illusion,cross-cultural psycholinguistics
Faculty \ School: Faculty of Arts and Humanities > School of Politics, Philosophy, Language and Communication Studies
Faculty of Social Sciences > School of Psychology
UEA Research Groups: Faculty of Arts and Humanities > Research Groups > Wittgenstein
Faculty of Arts and Humanities > Research Groups > Philosophy
Faculty of Arts and Humanities > Research Groups > UEA Experimental Philosophy Group
Related URLs:
Depositing User: LivePure Connector
Date Deposited: 04 Jan 2019 15:30
Last Modified: 21 Jul 2023 09:51
URI: https://ueaeprints.uea.ac.uk/id/eprint/69448
DOI: 10.1007/s11229-019-02081-4

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item