Political Independence, Accountability, and the Quality of Regulatory Decision-Making

Koop, Christel and Hanretty, Chris (2018) Political Independence, Accountability, and the Quality of Regulatory Decision-Making. Comparative Political Studies, 51 (1). pp. 38-75. ISSN 0010-4140

[img]
Preview
PDF (Manuscript September 2016) - Submitted Version
Download (467kB) | Preview

    Abstract

    Recent decades have seen a considerable increase in delegation to independent regulatory agencies, which has been justified by reference to the superior performance of these bodies relative to government departments. Yet, the hypothesis that more independent regulators do better work has hardly been tested. We examine the link using a comprehensive measure of the quality of work carried out by competition authorities in 30 Organisation for Economic Co-Operation and Development (OECD) countries, and new data on the design of these organizations. We find that formal independence has a positive and significant effect on quality. Contrary to expectations, though, formal political accountability does not boost regulatory quality, and there is no evidence that it increases the effect of independence by reducing the risk of slacking. The quality of work is also enhanced by increased staffing, more extensive regulatory powers, and spillover effects of a more capable bureaucratic system.

    Item Type: Article
    Faculty \ School: University of East Anglia > Faculty of Arts and Humanities > Research Groups > Political, Social and International Studies
    Faculty of Arts and Humanities > School of Politics, Philosophy, Language and Communication Studies
    Related URLs:
    Depositing User: Pure Connector
    Date Deposited: 04 Oct 2016 13:03
    Last Modified: 30 Oct 2018 16:30
    URI: https://ueaeprints.uea.ac.uk/id/eprint/60724
    DOI: 10.1177/0010414017695329

    Actions (login required)

    View Item