An experimental investigation using Cognitive Bias Modification for paranoid attributions in a non-clinical sample: Effects upon interpretation bias, emotions, and paranoia following a stressful paranoia induction.

Lodge, Joanna (2013) An experimental investigation using Cognitive Bias Modification for paranoid attributions in a non-clinical sample: Effects upon interpretation bias, emotions, and paranoia following a stressful paranoia induction. Doctoral thesis, University of East Anglia.

[img] PDF
Restricted to Repository staff only

Download (4MB)
    [img]
    Preview
    PDF
    Download (2887kB) | Preview

      Abstract

      Background: Bentall, Corcoran, Howard, Blackwood, and Kinderman (2001)
      suggested that paranoid individuals display an ‘external-personal bias’ of blaming
      negative events on other people rather than situational circumstances or themselves,
      however, the literature remains equivocal. This study tested whether Cognitive Bias
      Modification for Interpretations (CBM-I) could train a positive attribution bias and
      affect subsequent reactions to a stressor designed to induce paranoia.
      Method: Non-clinical participants were randomly assigned to positive CBM-I
      training (n = 18), or a neutral control CBM-I (n = 17). Participants were then subject
      to a stressful paranoia induction: seeing a live video of themselves whilst accessing
      negative self-beliefs and being given negative feedback when attempting an
      impossible task. The subsequent effects upon interpretation bias and state paranoia
      and emotions were assessed.
      Results: After the paranoia induction, participants in the positive CBM-I group
      demonstrated a more positive interpretation bias than those in the neutral control
      group: they endorsed less paranoid interpretations, although there was no difference
      in ratings of positive interpretations. However, both groups reported a similar
      increase in state paranoia and suspiciousness after the stressful paranoia induction,
      and there was no relationship between the trained interpretation bias and the changes
      in state paranoia. Unexpectedly, pre-existing trait paranoia was correlated with state
      paranoia and interpretation bias after the stressor.
      xiv
      Conclusions: This study demonstrated that CBM-I can train non-clinical
      participants to endorse less paranoid interpretations. Pre-existing trait paranoia had a
      stronger relationship to interpretative bias and state paranoia under stress than the
      CBM-I. The lack of a subsequent effect on emotional reactions suggests that further
      research is necessary to refine the materials and procedure, and test for possible
      small or varied effects in a larger sample. Unfortunately, significant methodological
      problems limit the conclusions that can be drawn about the theory that an externalpersonal
      attribution bias causes paranoia.

      Item Type: Thesis (Doctoral)
      Faculty \ School: Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences > Norwich Medical School
      Depositing User: Mia Reeves
      Date Deposited: 12 Mar 2014 14:34
      Last Modified: 12 Dec 2014 09:31
      URI: https://ueaeprints.uea.ac.uk/id/eprint/48112
      DOI:

      Actions (login required)

      View Item