La Commission européenne et le débat sur l'avenir de l'Europe

Dimitrakopoulos, Dionyssis G. and Kassim, Hussein (2005) La Commission européenne et le débat sur l'avenir de l'Europe. Critique Internationale, 29 (4). pp. 169-190. ISSN 1290-7839

Full text not available from this repository. (Request a copy)

Abstract

This article examines the Commission's preferences and preference formation in relation to the Convention and the negotiation of the Constitutional Treaty. Opposing rational choice accounts, which explain Commission action in terms of the tendency of bureaucratic actors to seek to maximise power, status and opportunities, it argues that the Commission is best seen as an internally differentiated arena, from which preferences emerge as a result of complex interactions that entail the use of power, institutionalised myths and routines. It contends, moreover, that, in contrast to earlier rounds of treaty reform, the Commission was an ineffective performer in the debate on the future of Europe. As well as committing tactical and strategic mistakes, the Commission was disadvantaged by the explicitly political nature of the exercise and the opportunity structure of the Convention compared to previous IGCs.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: commissions,congresses and conventions,european union,power,treaties
Faculty \ School: University of East Anglia > Faculty of Arts and Humanities > Research Groups > Political, Social and International Studies
Faculty of Arts and Humanities > School of Politics, Philosophy, Language and Communication Studies
Depositing User: Pure Connector
Date Deposited: 26 Nov 2013 15:16
Last Modified: 11 Mar 2019 15:39
URI: https://ueaeprints.uea.ac.uk/id/eprint/44981
DOI: 10.3917/crii.029.0169

Actions (login required)

View Item