Application of limiting marginal abatement costs in optimised strategies to reduce acidification and eutrophication in Europe: Illustrations using the Abatement Strategies Assessment Model, ASAM

Warren, Rachel F. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0122-1599 and ApSimon, Helen M. (2000) Application of limiting marginal abatement costs in optimised strategies to reduce acidification and eutrophication in Europe: Illustrations using the Abatement Strategies Assessment Model, ASAM. Journal of Environmental Assessment Policy and Management, 2 (1). pp. 119-166. ISSN 1464-3332

Full text not available from this repository. (Request a copy)

Abstract

The Convention on Long-Range Transboundary Air Pollution has led to the setting up of international protocols to reduce emissions of oxides of sulphur and nitrogen, ammonia, and volatile organic compounds (VOCs). Policy makers have made use of optimised abatement strategies derived by integrated assessment models (IAMs) which cost-effectively reduce acidification, eutrophication and tropospheric ozone. IAMs use information on costs of potential emission abatement options in individual countries. This paper explores the implications of limiting the abatement options in IAMs to those with moderate marginal costs. Three methods of applying this constraint to the optimisation are described. All methods indicate a loss of cost-effectiveness, this being most severe when marginal costs are constrained and environmental constraints are not compromised. However, when the overall investment level is capped and the strategy re-optimised taking into account marginal cost limitation whilst allowing violation of the original environmental targets, the loss of cost-effectiveness is less severe. For all three methods, significant changes occur in patterns of country expenditures and environmental protection, which tends to decrease significantly in those areas most difficult to protect. However, the re-optimisation method does provide the opportunity for "compensating" improvements to be achieved in other areas which are easier to protect. The choice of marginal cost limits strongly affects the extent and nature of these changes, as does the nature of the original optimised strategy.

Item Type: Article
Faculty \ School: University of East Anglia Research Groups/Centres > Theme - ClimateUEA
UEA Research Groups: University of East Anglia Schools > Faculty of Science > Tyndall Centre for Climate Change Research
Faculty of Science > Research Centres > Tyndall Centre for Climate Change Research
Depositing User: Pure Connector
Date Deposited: 04 Nov 2013 22:08
Last Modified: 15 Aug 2023 10:30
URI: https://ueaeprints.uea.ac.uk/id/eprint/42847
DOI: 10.1142/S1464333200000084

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item